NAAC

Institutional Assessment and Accreditation

(Effective from July 2017)

Accreditation - (Cycle: 1)


ST JOSEPH ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Mangaluru, Karnataka

Track ID : KACOGN106373

AISHE-ID : C-1277


Graphical Representation based on Quantitative & Qualitative Metrics



NAAC LOGO

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL

An Autonomous Institution of the University Grants Commission

P.O. Box No. 1075, Nagarbhavi, Bengaluru - 560 072, INDIA



Graphical Representation based on Quantitative & Qualitative Metrics



Created with Highcharts 6.0.1QnM & QlM Weightage scored bythe institution in percentageCurricular AspectsTeaching-learningand EvaluationTeaching-learning and EvaluationResearch,Innovations andExtensionResearch, Innovations and ExtensionInfrastructure andLearning ResourcesInfrastructure and Learning ResourcesStudent Support andProgressionStudent Support and ProgressionGovernance,Leadership andManagementGovernance, Leadership and ManagementInstitutional Valuesand Best PracticesInstitutional Values and Best Practices7050100Metrics(QnM & QlM) Weightage scored by the institution in percentageFig: The criterion wise distribution of weighted scores (QnM & QlM) for the institution


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Key IndicatorsGPAHigh Performance Key IndicatorsAverage Performance Key IndicatorsLow Performance Key IndicatorsCurricular Planning …Curricular Planning and ImplementationAcademic FlexibilityCurriculum Enrichm…Curriculum EnrichmentTeaching- Learning …Teaching- Learning ProcessTeacher Profile and …Teacher Profile and QualityEvaluation Process …Evaluation Process and ReformsStudent Performanc…Student Performance and Learning OutcomesStudent Satisfaction…Student Satisfaction SurveyResource Mobilizati…Resource Mobilization for ResearchInnovation Ecosyste…Innovation EcosystemExtension ActivitiesCollaborationPhysical FacilitiesLibrary as a Learnin…Library as a Learning ResourceIT InfrastructureMaintenance of Ca…Maintenance of Campus InfrastructureStudent ProgressionStudent Participatio…Student Participation and ActivitiesAlumni EngagementInstitutional Vision …Institutional Vision and LeadershipStrategy Developm…Strategy Development and DeploymentFaculty Empowerme…Faculty Empowerment StrategiesFinancial Managem…Financial Management and Resource MobilizationInternal Quality Ass…Internal Quality Assurance SystemBest PracticesFeedback SystemStudent Enrollment …Student Enrollment and ProfileCatering to Student…Catering to Student DiversityStudent SupportInstitutional Values …Institutional Values and Social ResponsibilitiesInstitutional Distinc…Institutional DistinctivenessResearch Publicatio…Research Publications and Awards012345Comparison of QnM & QlM in Key Indicators based on performance(GPA)Fig: The comparison of Key Indicators (QnM & QlM) based on grade point average(GPA) extracted from the institution


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1GPA4444443.43.43.133.133.53.5443.433.433.63.6441.51.53.643.6444443.353.354444443.83.83.63.63.53.53.83.83.673.673.333.333.073.0744LPKI (0-2.0)HPKI (3.01-4.0)Curricular Plannin…Curricular Planning and ImplementationAcademic FlexibilityCurriculum Enrich…Curriculum EnrichmentTeaching- Learnin…Teaching- Learning ProcessTeacher Profile an…Teacher Profile and QualityEvaluation Proces…Evaluation Process and ReformsStudent Performa…Student Performance and Learning OutcomesStudent Satisfacti…Student Satisfaction SurveyResource Mobiliza…Resource Mobilization for ResearchInnovation Ecosys…Innovation EcosystemResearch Publicati…Research Publications and AwardsExtension ActivitiesCollaborationPhysical FacilitiesLibrary as a Learn…Library as a Learning ResourceIT InfrastructureMaintenance of Ca…Maintenance of Campus InfrastructureStudent ProgressionStudent Participati…Student Participation and ActivitiesAlumni Engageme…Alumni EngagementInstitutional Visio…Institutional Vision and LeadershipStrategy Develop…Strategy Development and DeploymentFaculty Empower…Faculty Empowerment StrategiesFinancial Manage…Financial Management and Resource MobilizationInternal Quality A…Internal Quality Assurance SystemBest Practices012345Comparison of LPKI and HPKI based on QnM & QlMFig: Comparison of LPKI(0-2.0) and HPKI(3.01-4.0) based on QnM & QlM


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Distribution of High Performance Key Indicators (3.01-4.0)Fig: High Performance Key Indicators(3.01-4.0) for the institutionCurricular Planning and Implementation:4.3%Curricular Planning and Implementation:4.3%Academic Flexibility:4.3%Academic Flexibility:4.3%Curriculum Enrichment:4.3%Curriculum Enrichment:4.3%Teaching- Learning Process:3.7%Teaching- Learning Process:3.7%Teacher Profile and Quality:3.4%Teacher Profile and Quality:3.4%Evaluation Process and Reforms:3.8%Evaluation Process and Reforms:3.8%Student Performance and Learning Outcomes:4.3%Student Performance and Learning Outcomes:4.3%Student Satisfaction Survey:3.7%Student Satisfaction Survey:3.7%Resource Mobilization for Research:3.9%Resource Mobilization for Research:3.9%Innovation Ecosystem:4.3%Innovation Ecosystem:4.3%Extension Activities:3.9%Extension Activities:3.9%Collaboration:4.3%Collaboration:4.3%Physical Facilities:4.3%Physical Facilities:4.3%Library as a Learning Resource:3.6%Library as a Learning Resource:3.6%IT Infrastructure:4.3%IT Infrastructure:4.3%Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure:4.3%Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure:4.3%Student Progression:4.3%Student Progression:4.3%Student Participation and Activities:4.1%Student Participation and Activities:4.1%Alumni Engagement:3.9%Alumni Engagement:3.9%Institutional Vision and Leadership:3.8%Institutional Vision and Leadership:3.8%Strategy Development and Deployment:4.1%Strategy Development and Deployment:4.1%Faculty Empowerment Strategies:4.0%Faculty Empowerment Strategies:4.0%Financial Management and Resource Mobilization:3.6%Financial Management and Resource Mobilization:3.6%Internal Quality Assurance System:3.3%Internal Quality Assurance System:3.3%Best Practices:4.3%Best Practices:4.3%


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Distribution of Average Performance Key Indicators (2.01-3.0)Fig: Average Performance Key Indicators(2.01-3.0) for the institutionFeedback System:15.3%Feedback System:15.3%Student Enrollment and Profile:14.3%Student Enrollment and Profile:14.3%Catering to Student Diversity:15.9%Catering to Student Diversity:15.9%Student Support:17.9%Student Support:17.9%Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities:18.2%Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities:18.2%Institutional Distinctiveness:18.4%Institutional Distinctiveness:18.4%


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Distribution of Low Performance Key Indicators (0-2.0)Fig: Low Performance Key Indicators(0-2.0) for the institutionResearch Publications and Awards:100.0%Research Publications and Awards:100.0%


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1GPAComparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point AverageFig: Comparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point Average3.683.683.223.223.33.33.873.873.433.433.423.423.293.29Criteria GPACurricular AspectsTeaching-learning …Teaching-learning and EvaluationResearch, Innovat…Research, Innovations and ExtensionInfrastructure and…Infrastructure and Learning ResourcesStudent Support a…Student Support and ProgressionGovernance, Lead…Governance, Leadership and ManagementInstitutional Value…Institutional Values and Best Practices012345


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsBenchmark ValuePerformance of metrics in Curricular Aspects, Teaching-learning and EvaluationFig: Performance of metrics in Criteria I & II44444444444444444411221144334400334444334411334444334433444444443.433.43Score1.1.11.1.31.2.11.2.21.2.31.3.11.3.21.3.31.4.11.4.22.1.12.1.22.1.32.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.42.4.12.4.22.4.32.4.42.4.52.5.12.5.22.5.32.5.42.6.12.6.22.6.32.7.10123452.6.2Benchmark Value: 4


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsBenchmark ValuePerformance of metrics in Research, Innovations and Extension, Infrastructure and Learning ResourcesFig: Performance of metrics in Criteria III & IV444433444444440022113344444444444444334444444422444444444444Score3.1.13.1.23.1.33.2.13.2.23.3.13.3.23.3.33.3.43.3.53.4.13.4.33.4.43.5.14.1.14.1.24.1.34.1.44.2.14.2.24.2.34.2.44.2.54.2.64.3.14.3.24.3.34.3.44.4.14.4.2012345


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsBenchmark ValuePerformance of metrics in Student Support and Progression, Governance, Leadership and Management,Institutional Values and Best PracticesPerformance of metrics in Student Support and Progression, Governance, Leadership and Management, Institutional Values and Best PracticesFig: Performance of metrics in Criteria V,VI & VII2244442222444444443344334444334433444444444444224444333333004444444400444444444422112244444444444444334433Score5.1.15.1.35.1.55.2.15.3.15.3.35.4.26.1.16.2.16.2.36.3.16.3.36.3.56.4.36.5.26.5.47.1.17.1.37.1.57.1.77.1.97.1.117.1.137.1.157.1.177.1.197.3.1012345


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsScoreScore2.2.33.3.31.1.11.1.31.2.11.2.21.2.31.3.11.3.21.3.31.4.12.1.32.2.22.3.22.3.32.4.12.4.42.4.52.5.22.5.42.6.12.6.22.6.33.1.13.1.23.2.13.2.23.3.13.3.23.4.33.4.43.5.1012345Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsScoreScore6.5.34.1.14.1.34.2.24.2.44.3.14.3.34.4.15.1.25.1.65.2.35.3.35.4.36.2.26.2.46.3.26.3.56.5.47.1.17.1.137.1.157.1.177.1.27.1.57.1.77.2.1012345Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Score2.2.33.3.31.1.11.1.31.2.11.2.21.2.31.3.11.3.21.3.31.4.12.1.32.2.22.3.22.3.32.4.12.4.42.4.52.5.22.5.42.6.12.6.22.6.33.1.13.1.23.2.13.2.23.3.13.3.23.4.33.4.43.5.132024Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Score6.5.37.1.34.1.14.1.24.1.34.1.44.2.24.2.34.2.44.2.54.3.14.3.24.3.34.3.44.4.14.4.25.1.25.1.35.1.65.2.15.2.35.3.15.3.35.4.25.4.36.1.26.2.26.2.36.2.46.3.16.3.26.3.36.3.56.4.16.5.46.5.57.1.17.1.127.1.137.1.147.1.157.1.167.1.177.1.187.1.27.1.47.1.57.1.67.1.77.1.87.2.1510244.2.5Score: 4Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)